Background

Strategies for improving the productivity of water in both rainfed and irrigated agriculture so as to ensure social, economic and environmental sustainability in river basins, adapted. New knowledge demanded by relevant institutions regarding alternative and best options for improving Productivity of Water in Agriculture and Interacting Systems in Eastern Africa, Identified and Verified with stakeholders

Specific objectives

  1. Collate, Evaluate and Disseminate to stakeholders Methodological tools for assessing PWA in the case study basins (CSB)
  2. Evaluate the benefits and consequences of options for improving PWA under different scenarios in CSB,
  3. Produce a River Basin Management Decision Aide (RBMDA) with robust modules dealing with selection of options for increasing productivity of water in agricultural as well as interacting systems, Produce.
  4. Adapt and Use Knowledge sharing tools that link stakeholders from the community to basin to national level, to disseminate the developed knowledge on PWA

Key findings

Stakeholders in agriculture and water related issues have different perceptions about the productivity of water. This is evident by the different definitions of productivity of water, though most of the definitions hinge around the benefits accrued from water use. The viewpoint of smallholder farmers’ regarding the productivity of water is important in order to promote the concept of productivity of water in a country like Tanzania. This is because 95 percent of the farmers are smallholders.

This paper presents the  farmers’  understanding  of the productivity of water in the Mkoji sub- catchment (MSC) in the Ruaha River Basin   in Tanzania. It also presents their practices aimed at increasing the productivity of water in the area. It reveals that the concept of productivity of water has been part of the smallholder farmers in Mkoji. The farmers’ concept of productivity of water is the same as that of other stakeholders, only that it is less formal than as expected by experts. Farmers in the sub-catchment judge productivity of water based on the amount of rainfall and its influence of their yields. Productivity of water is high or low if the average seasonal rainfall is ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

They put so much value to water that they go to the extent where they are willing to pay more to acquire a piece of land close to a water source. Furthermore, there   is evidence that they engage in fights and ‘steal’ water as a result of the high value they place on water. The farmers have adopted tillage methods, agronomic practices and crop diversification approaches to maximize yield from available water.

The paper concludes that these strategies adopted by farmers could be a good starting point for formulating measures to improving productivity of water in the area. Therefore, there is a strong need for an in- depth understanding of farmers’ practices to determine the most effective, economical and sustainable options in increasing productivity of water, and to thereby formulate approaches for adaptation, uptake and upscalin .

This paper explores farmers’ perceptions of productivity of water, practices and coping  mechanisms for achieving greater water productivity. The perceptions are generated based on farmers’ understanding of water productivity, the value they place on land and water, and the struggle and conflicts resulting from the value they put on water.

Furthermore, the paper presents farmers’ strategies to estimate productivity of water, and discusses the impact of the farmers’ practices, coping strategies and limitations associated with the practices.

It was concluded from this paper that the theories and figures  of productivity of water are less important to farmers, than their approaches to enhance their ability to effectively utilize water and to maximize production.

Outputs

Kasele, S.S. 2005. Knowledge sharing and communication tools for dialogue issues on productivity of water in agriculture: case study of Mkoji sub-catchment in Usangu Plains, Tanzania. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in agricultural education and extension of Sokoine University of Agriculture.

  • Status: Completed Project
  • Funding organization: Comprehensive Assessment (CA)
  • Project Year: 2003 - 2005